Morrill Tariff  Bill
The  U. S. House of  Representatives
passed  the  Morrill Tariff Bill  (H. R. 338)
105  to  64,  Thursday,  May 10, 1860.
The 0nly  SouthernCongressman  who  voted  for  “raising  the  average  tariff  from  about 15%   to 37%,…”  was from  Tennessee:
1.    William T. Avery   Against,
2.    Reese B. Brabson       —,
3.    Emerson Etheridge    For,
4.    Robert Hatton             —,
5.    Horace Maynard         —,
6.    Thomas A. R. Nelson  —,
7.    James M. Quarles        —,
8.    William B. Stokes        —,
9.    James H. Thomas  Against,
10.  John V. Wright      Against,
And it was decided in the affirmative,
Yeas ... 105            Nays ... 64
The yeas and nays  being desired by
one-fifth  of the members present.
               Proposals  and  Debate
           The United States Senate
                36th Congress,  2nd Session
     December 11, 1860,  The  Morrill Tariff  Bill,  was  discussed  by  the  U. S. Senate.   Page 37:  “ Mr. Bragg  submitted the following resolution;  which  was considered  by  unanimous consent,  and  agreed  to:  Resolved,  That the chaplain  elected by the Senate  on the 15th day of  December, 1859,  to officiate  on the part of  the Senate  at the last session,  be continued  during the present session of  Congress.”
“ The Senate proceeded to consider  the resolution submitted by  Mr. Hale,  the 5th instant,  to print extra copies of  the eleventh volume of  the  Pacific Railroad Report.”
“ On motion by  Mr. Cameron,  that  the Senate  proceed  to  the consideration of  the bill  (H. R. 338)  to  provide for  the  payment  of  outstanding treasury notes,  to  authorize a  loan,  to  regulate  and  fix  the duties  on  imports  and  for  other purposes.  It  was determined  in  the affirmative, . . .”
“ The Senate  resumed,  as  in  committee of  the whole,  the consideration of  the said bill,  with the amendment proposed thereto  by  Mr. Lane.  On motion by  Mr. Lane,  that the bill  and the proposed amendment be  recommitted  to the Committee on Finance.  It was determined  in the affirmative, . . .”
December 12, 1860,  “ Mr. Bigler submitted an amendment,  which he intended to propose to the bill  (H. R. 338) . . ,  and moved that the same  be referred to  the Committee  on Finance.”   “ It was determined  in the affirmative.”
December 20, 1860,  “ Mr. Hunter,  from the Committee  on Finance,  to whom  was  recommitted  the bill  (H. R. 338) . . ,  reported it  without amendment,  and  with a  recommendation that  the consideration of  the bill  be  postponed  to  the  4th day  of  March  next.”
January 18, 1861,  Page 115:  “On  motion by  Mr. Cameron,  The Senate  resumed,  as  in  Committee of  the Whole,  the consideration of  the bill  (H. R. 338.) . . .”   “ On motion by  Mr. Cameron,  Ordered,  That  the further consideration  of  the bill  be postponed  to  and made  the special order of  the day  for Wednesday next,  at  one o'clock.”
January 23, 1861,  Pages 136-137.  “ On  motion by  Mr. Simmons,  Ordered,  That  the bill  be  referred to  a  select committee,  to consist of  five members,  with instructions  to report  to the Senate  on Wednesday next,  the 30th instant.  On motion by  Mr. Gwin,  Ordered,  That  the Committee  be appointed by  the  Vice-President.”
January 24, 1861,  Page 139:  “ The Vice-President,  announced the appointment of  the select committee,  to whom  was referred  the bill  (H. R. 338.) . . .”
        James F.  Simmons, Rhode Island,
        R. M. T.  Hunter, Virginia,
         William  Bigler, Pennsylvania,
   William Pitt  Fessenden,  Maine,   and
   William M.  Gwin, California,
“ Mr. Seward  presented additional papers  in support of  the claim of  Samuel F. B. Morse,  for  an extension of  his patent;   which  were referred to  the Committee on Patents  and the Patent Office.
Mr. Wilson  presented a  petition  of  manufacturers of  tools and firearms of  Massachusetts,  Maine,  Connecticut,  and  New Hampshire,  praying that  the duty on steel  may not  be  increased;  which was referred  to the select committee  on the tariff bill,  (H. R. 338.) ”
Page 140.  “ On motion  by  Mr. King,  Ordered,  That  the petition of  manufacturers of  cutlery,  edge tools,  and machinery,  yesterday  presented by him,  be referred  to the select committee on the tariff bill,  (H. R. 338.)
On motion  by  Mr. Hunter,  Ordered,  That  the petitions of  hardware dealers  and manufacturers of  edge tools  and machinery,  and other articles of  steel or iron,  heretofore  presented to the Senate,  be referred to  the select committee on the tariff bill,  (H. R. 338.)
Mr. Clingman  presented  a  petition of  importers of  window glass,  in the city of  New York,  praying  such a modification of  the tariff bill  now  before the Senate  as will make  the duty on glass  more equal  and just;  which was referred  to the select committee  on the tariff bill,  (H. R. 338.) . . .”
Page 141:  “ Mr. Fessenden  presented  a petition of  citizens of  New York,  praying that  a donation of  land  and other assistance  may  be granted to the  People’s Pacific Railroad Company.   Ordered,  That  it lie on the table.   Mr. Fessenden was,  on his motion,  excused  from serving as a member  of  the select committee,  to whom  was referred  the bill  (H. R. 338.) . . .”
“ On  motion by  Mr. Fessenden,  Ordered,  That  the Vice-President  appoint a member  to fill the vacancy  in the  said committee;  and ”  Mr. Jacob Collamer  of  Vermont,  was appointed.”
January 30, 1861,  Page 165:  “ Mr. Simmons presented a  petition of  importers  of  the city of  New York,  praying that  the tariff bill  now  before the Senate  may  be postponed  until  the next session of  Congress;  which  was referred to  the select committee  on the tariff bill,  (H. R. 338.) ”
February 01, 1861,  Page 174.  “ Mr. Simmons,  from the select committee,  to whom  was referred the bill  (H. R. 338.) . . ,  reported it  with amendments.
On motion by  Mr. Simmons,  Ordered,  That  the bill and amendments  be printed,  and that  five hundred additional copies thereof  be printed.”  (Postponed  to  Wednesday next.)
February 06, 1861,  Page 195.  “ The Vice-President  stated that  the hour of  one o'clock  having arrived,  it was the duty of  the Chair  to  call up the special order of  the day  for that hour,  which was the bill  (H. R. 338) . . ;  but  that  the unfinished business of  yesterday,  which was the motion to print additional copies of  the message  of  the President of  the United States,  communicating  the resolutions  passed by the legislature of  Virginia  in favor of  a  peaceable settlement of  the questions  which now threaten the Union,  had preference  of  the special order,  and  was  the business  now  before the Senate; . . .”  ( H. R. 338  was postponed.)
February 08, 1861,  Page 203:  “ The Vice-President  signed . . .  the enrolled resolution  (H. R. 71)    extending the time  for  taking testimony  on the application of  Cyrus H. McCormick  for the extension of  his patent.”
“ The following message was received  from  the President of  the United States, . . .”  “ I  deemed it  a duty  to  transmit to Congress,  with my message of  the  8th  of  January,  the correspondence  which occurred  in  December last  between  the  ‘commissioners’  of  South Carolina  and myself.   Since that period,  on the  14th January  Colonel Isaac W. Hayne,  the attorney general of  South Carolina,  called  and informed me  that  he was the bearer of  a letter  from Governor Pickens  to myself,  which  he would deliver  the next day.  He was,  however,  induced,  by  the interposition of  Hon. Jefferson Davis  and  nine other senators  from  the seceded and seceding States,  not  to deliver it  on the day  appointed,  nor  was it communicated to me  until  the 31st of  January,  with his letter of  that date.  Their letter to him  urging this delay  bears  date  January 15,  and  was the commencement of  a correspondence,  the whole of  which  in my possession  I  now  submit  to Congress.  A reference to each letter of  the series,  in proper order,  accompanies this message.   JAMES BUCHANAN.   Washington  February 8, 1861.
”
     “ On motion by  Mr. Simmons,  that  the Senate  proceed to  the consideration of  the bill  (H. R. 338.) . . .”
Page 204:  “ The Senate resumed,  as in  Committee of  the Whole,  the consideration of  the said  bill.”
“ On motion by  Mr. Gwin,  that  the Senate  proceed to  the consideration of  executive business,  It was determined in the negative, . . .”
“ On motion by  Mr. Fitch,  that  the Senate adjourn,  It was determined in the negative, . . .   So  the motion  was not  agreed to.”
On motion  by  Mr. Latham,  The Senate adjourned.”
February 09, 1861,  Page 206:  Postponed.
February 13, 1861,  Page 227:  “ On motion  by  Mr. Cameron,  The Senate resumed,  as in  Committee of  the Whole,  the consideration of  the bill  (H. R. 338.) . . ;  and,  After debate,  The Senate adjourned.
February 16, 1861,  Page 242:  “ On  the question  to agree  to the amendment  proposed by  Mr. Seward,  to wit:  In the amendment  reported by the select committee  to the twenty-ninth section of  the bill,  strike out  of  the amendment  the words ‘ninety days,’  in the  thirty-second line,  and  in lieu  thereof  insert  three years,  It was determined  in the affirmative, . . .”
Page 243:  Further amendment  was made  “on motion  by  Mr. Seward,  to strike out the twenty-ninth section of  the bill,  as amended, . . .”  and
“ On motion by  Mr. Wade,  to amend the bill,  section 10, line 26,  after the word  ‘linseed,’  by striking out  ‘ten,’  and  in lieu thereof  inserting  sixteen,  It was determined  in the affirmative, . . .”
February 18, 1861,  Page 252:  “On motion by  Mr. Simmons,  to amend the bill  by  striking out  in the eighteenth section,  line four,  the following words:  ‘printed in the English language,  or  of  which the English forms the text,  bound  or unbound,  fifteen cents per pound;  and  on  all books  printed in foreign languages,  eight cents per pound,’  and  in lieu  thereof  inserting:  periodicals and pamphlets,  and  all printed matter,  and illustrated books and papers;  and  on watches  and  parts of watches,  and watch materials,  and  unfinished parts of  watches,  fifteen per centum ad valorem.”
Page 253:  “ On  motion by  Mr. Seward,  to amend the proposed amendment  by inserting  after the word  ‘papers,’  ten per centum ad valorem.   It was determined in the negative, . . .”   “ The amendment of  Mr. Simmons  was then  agreed to.
The bill  having been further amended,  On motion by  Mr. Simmons,  to amend the bill  by  striking out  in the fifth section,  line nine,  after the word  ‘first,’  the following words:  ‘On  raw sugar,  commonly called  Muscovado or brown sugar,  not advanced beyond its raw state  by  claying, boiling, clarifying,  or other process,  one cent per pound; . . .’ ”  Page 254.
Page 255:  “ On the question  to agree  to the amendment  proposed by  Mr. Simmons,  It was determined  in the affirmative, . . .  So  the amendment  was agreed to.
On motion by  Mr. Simmons  to amend the bill  by  striking out  in the  first section,  line six,  the word  ‘twenty-one,’  and  in lieu thereof  inserting  ten.”
Page 256:  “ On the question  to agree to the amendment of  Mr. Simmons,  It was determined in the affirmative.
On motion by  Mr. Pearce,  to amend the bill  by inserting  at the end of  the third section  the words:  Provided  further,  That  no part of  the loan  hereby authorized  shall  be  applied to  the service of  the present fiscal year,
It was determined in the affirmative.
An amendment being proposed by  Mr. Simmons,
On motion by  Mr. Hunter,  that the Senate  adjourn,   It was determined  in the negative, . . .
The number of  senators  voting  not  constituting  a  quorum  of  the Senate,   On motion by  Mr. Doolittle,  The Senate adjourned.”
February 19, 1861,  Page 260:  Motions by  Mr. Simmons,  Mr. Bayard,  and  Mr. Bingham,  to amend the bill  were accepted.   Pages 261-264.
February 20, 1861,  (H. R. 338.)   Pages 267-269:  “ On the question  to concur  in the following amendment,  made  as in  Committee of  the Whole,  to wit:  strike out  in the fifth section  the following words:  ‘On  raw sugar,  commonly called  Muscovado  or  brown sugar, . . .’  And  in lieu thereof  insert the following:  On  raw sugar,  commonly called Muscovado,  or  brown sugar,  not advanced beyond the raw state . . .  and on  syrup of  sugar,  or of  sugar cane,  and concentrated molasses, . . .  and  not refined,  three fourths of  one cent per pound;  on refined sugars,  whether loaf  or  lump,  crushed or pulverized,  two cents per pound;  on sugars  after being refined,  when they are tinctured,  colored,  or  in  any way  adulterated,  and  on sugar candy,  four cents per pound: . . .  on molasses,  two cents per gallon;  on confectionary  of  all kinds,  not  otherwise  provided for,  thirty per centum  ad valorem.
Second.  On coffee,  one cent and a half  per pound;  on tea,  when imported from  any port  or place  beyond the Cape of  Good Hope,  four cents per pound;  when imported from  any port  or place  this side  the Cape of  Good Hope,  other than  in the country where produced,  four cents per pound,  and  an addition thereto  of  ten per centum ad valorem: . . .”
Pages 270-274:  Changes are proposed  and accepted.
Page 275:  “ No further amendment  being proposed,  Ordered,  That  the amendments be engrossed  and  the bill  read  a third time.  The said bill,  as amended,  was read the third time.   On the question,  Shall the bill pass?   It was determined  in the affirmative,  Yeas ... 25   Nays ... 14 ”
“ Those  who voted in the affirmative are,  Messrs.”
Henry B. Anthony  (Rhode Island),
Edward D. Baker (Oregon),
William Bigler  (Pennsylvania),
Kinsley S. Bingham (Michigan),
Simon Cameron (Pennsylvania),
Zachariah Chandler  (Michigan),
Daniel Clark (New Hampshire),
James R. Doolittle  (Wisconsin),
Charles Durkee  (Wisconsin),
William Pitt Fessenden  (Maine),
Solomon Foot  (Vermont),
Lafayette S. Foster  (Connecticut),
James W. Grimes  (Iowa),
John P. Hale  (New Hampshire),
James Harlan  (Iowa),
Preston King  (New York),
Justin Smith Morrill  (Vermont),
William H. Seward (New York),
James F. Simmons  (Rhode Island),
Charles Sumner  (Massachusetts),
John C. Ten Eyck  (New Jersey),
Lyman Trumbull  (Illinois),
Benjamin F. Wade  (Ohio),
Morton S. Wilkinson  (Minnesota),
Henry Wilson  (Massachusetts).
Those who voted in  the negative are,  Messrs.
Thomas Bragg  (North Carolina),
Thomas L. Clingman  (North Carolina),
Stephen A. Douglas (lllinois),
James S. Green (Missouri),
R. M. T. Hunter  (Virginia),
Robert W. Johnson,  of  Arkansas,
Andrew Johnson,  of  Tennessee,
Joseph Lane  (Oregon),
Milton S. Latham  (California),
Alfred O. P. Nicholson  (Tennessee),
James A. Pearce  (Maryland),
Trusten Polk  (Missouri),
Henry M. Rice  (Minnesota),
William K. Sebastian  (Arkansas).
So  it was Resolved,  That the bill  pass  with amendments.  Ordered,  That  the Secretary  request the concurrence of  the  House of  Representatives  in the amendments.”
February 25, 1861,  Page 302.
February 26, 1861,  Page 317. 
February 27, 1861,  Pages 330-332.  “ The Vice-President  laid before the Senate  a communication  from the  Hon. John Tyler,  president of  a convention  assembled  in the city  of  Washington,  composed of  commissioners  appointed by  the authorities of  twenty-one  of  the States  of  the Confederacy,  for the purpose of  recommending  some method of  adjusting  the unhappy differences  which now disturb  the peace of  the Union  and  threaten  its continuance,  transmitting  certain  proposed amendments  to  the  Constitution of  the  United States,  recommended by  said convention,  with the request  of  that body  that  they may be  submitted to  the several States  of  the  national Confederacy.   The communication  was read.”
February 28, 1861,  Page 336:  “ The Speaker of  the House of  Representatives  having signed  an enrolled bill  (H. R. 388)  to provide for the payment of  outstanding treasury notes,  to authorize a loan,  to regulate  and fix  the duties on imports,  and  for other purposes,  I  am directed  to bring it  to the Senate  for the signature  of  its President.”
Page 337:  “ Mr. Crittenden,  from the select committee,  to whom  was referred  the communication  yesterday received  from the president  of  the convention of  commissioners  appointed by  the authorities  of  twenty-one States  of  the Union,  assembled  at  the city of  Washington;  for  the purpose of  agreeing  upon  some  plan  for adjusting  the questions  which  now  threaten  the Union,  reported  a joint resolution  (S. 70)  proposing  certain amendments  to the Constitution of  the United States.”
Mr. Trumbull,  appointed  to  notify  Abraham Lincoln,  of  his election  as  President of  the  United States,  reported: . . .”
Page 339:  “ The Vice-President  signed the following enrolled bills,  and they were delivered to the committee  to be presented  to the President of  the United States:  H. R. 338.  An act  to provide for  the payment of  outstanding treasury notes,  to authorize a loan,  to regulate and fix  the duties on imports,  and for other purposes.”
“ A message  from the  House of  Representatives,  by  Mr. Forney,  its Clerk:  Mr. President:  The House of  Representatives  has passed  a  joint resolution  (H. R. 80)  to amend the Constitution of  the United States,  in which  it requests the concurrence  of  the Senate.”
Page 340:  The hour of  one o'clock  had arrived,  and  the special order of  the day  for that hour,  was  was the report of  the select committee,  regarding:  “ some plan  for the adjustment of  the questions  which  now  agitate the country  and threaten the Union.”  [ Joint resolution  (S. 70) ]
March  01, 1861,  Page 348:  “ Mr. Bingham  reported  from the committee  that  they presented  to the  President of  the United States,  on  the  28th ultimo,  the following  enrolled bills:  H. R. 338. . . .”

Morrill Tariff Bill:   Enacted legislation —
   Published in the Congressional Globe:
     TARIFF  OF  1861.
   The Unionist— John C. Calhoun.

     Historical  Histri-Onyx !

Meating of  the Minds?  Politics of  Slavery,
TaxJudas.com  LandGrab.us