Saturday,  2 March,  1861.
     Journal of  the Senate  of  the
   United States of America.

Page 360:  Mr. Sumner  moved that  the entry in the journal of  yesterday,  “ be corrected,  so that the same shall read:  The joint resolution  (H. R. 80)  to amend the Constitution of  the United States  was read the first time.”
 Shall the resolution  be read  a  second time? 
Page 361:  The said resolution was read  the second time.”
Page 363:  The President of  the United States  approved and signed, . . .”   “And  on this day,  An act  (H. R. 338)  to provide for the payment of  outstanding treasury notes,  to authorize a loan,  to regulate and  fix  the duties on imports,  and  for other purposes.”
Page 374:  The President  (Mr. Fitch in the chair),”  “called up the joint resolution  (S. 70)  proposing certain amendments to the Constitution  of  the  United States;”  and,  “ In the progress of  the debate which ensued,  A disturbance arose in the galleries;  when  The President  (Mr. Fitch  in the chair)  directed the Sergeant-at-arms  to clear the galleries  and close the doors of  the galleries.
The Sergeant-at-arms  having executed the order of  the presiding officer,  and order being restored,  Mr. Crittenden asked  and obtained  unanimous consent  to submit a motion:  that when the Senate adjourn,  it adjourn  to meet to-morrow,  at  half past twelve o'clock;  and,  On the question  to agree  to the motion,  It  was determined  in  the negative, . . .
“On  motion  by  Mr. Douglas,  to postpone the consideration of  the pending question  and all prior orders,  and that the Senate  proceed  to the consideration of  the joint resolution  (H. R. 80)  to amend the Constitution of  the United States.
Page 375:  “On motion by  Mr. Lane,  and  by  unanimous consent,  Ordered,  That  the doors of  the gallery  to the left  of  the Chair  be  opened  for  the admission  of  ladies only.
Mr. King,  by unanimous consent,  submitted a motion that the doors of  the gallery  to the right of  the Chair  be opened for the admission of  spectators.
The Senate proceeded,  by unanimous consent,  to consider the motion,
On motion by  Mr. Latham,  to amend the motion  by striking out the word  ‘spectators,’  and in lieu thereof  inserting ladies only,   On motion by  Mr. Clingman,  Ordered,  That the motion of  Mr. King,  with the proposed amendment,  lie on the table.
The Senate proceeded to consider,  as in  Committee of  the Whole,  the joint resolution  (H. R. 80)  to amend the Constitution of  the United States.”
Page 377:  Mr. Crittenden  presented the credentials of  the  Hon. John C. Breckinridge,  elected  a  senator  by  the legislature of  the State of  Kentucky  for the term of  six years,  commencing on the  4th day of  March, 1861;  which were read.
A disorder  prevailing in the galleries  to the right of  the Chair,   On motion by  Mr. Douglas,  That the galleries  to the right of  the Chair  be cleared,  It was determined  in the affirmative, . . .”
 Order being restored, . . .”
 The Senate resumed,  as in Committee of  the Whole,  the consideration of  the joint resolution  (H. R. 80)  to amend the Constitution of  the United States; . . .
Proposed  Article 1.  through  Article 7.
Page 379:  On motion by  Mr. Doolittle,  to amend  the proposed amendment  by inserting at the end  thereof  the following:
Article 8.  Under this Constitution,  as originally adopted  and  as it now exists,  no State  has power  to withdraw  from the jurisdiction of  the United States;  and this Constitution,  and all laws  passed in pursuance of  its delegated powers,  are the supreme law of  the land,  anything contained in  any constitution,  ordinance,  or  act  of  any State  to the contrary  notwithstanding.  It was determined  in the negative,  Yeas ... 18   Nays ... 28 
Page 383:  No amendment  being made,  the resolution was reported  to the Senate.  Ordered,  That it pass  to a third reading.  The said resolution  was read  the third time.”  (H. R. 80)  “On the question,  Shall  the resolution pass?  It was determined  in the affirmative,  Yeas ... 24   Nays ... 12
On motion  by  Mr. Bigler,  The yeas and nays  being desired by  one fifth of  the senators present,   Those who voted  in  the affirmative are,  Messrs.”
        Henry B.  Anthony,      Rhode Island
                and  Providence  Plantations,
    Edward D.  Baker, Oregon,
         William  Bigler, Pennsylvania,
         Jesse D.  Bright, Indiana,
           John J.  Crittenden,  Kentucky,
            James  Dixon, Connecticut,
    Stephen A.  Douglas, lllinois,
   Lafayette S.  Foster, Connecticut,
      James W.  Grimes, Iowa,
   William M.  Gwin, California,
            James  Harlan, Iowa,
        R. M. T.  Hunter, Virginia,
         Andrew  Johnson, Tennessee,
         Anthony  Kennedy, Maryland,
       Milton S.  Latham, California,
       James M.  Mason, Virginia,
   Justin Smith  Morrill, Vermont,
  Alfred  O. P.  Nicholson, Tennessee,
          Trusten  Polk, Missouri,
      George E.  Pugh, Ohio,
       Henry M.  Rice, Minnesota,
William King  Sebastian, Arkansas,
          John C.  Ten Eyck, New Jersey,
          John R.  Thomson, New Jersey.

 Those who voted in the negative  are,  Messrs.”
Kinsley S. Bingham,   Michigan,
Zachariah Chandler,   Michigan,
Daniel Clark,              New Hampshire,
James R. Doolittle,     Wisconsin,
Charles Durkee,          Wisconsin,
Solomon Foot,            Vermont,
Preston King,              New York,
Charles Sumner,          Massachusetts,
Lyman Trumbull,         Illinois,
Benjamin F. Wade,      Ohio,
Morton S. Wilkinson,   Minnesota,
Henry Wilson,              Massachusetts.


“The President  (Mr. Polk  in the chair)
announced that the joint resolution was passed.


Mr. Trumbull raised a question of  order:  whether,  the joint resolution  being  a  proposition  to amend the Constitution of  the United States,  it did not require  an affirmative vote of  two thirds  of  the members  composing the Senate,  to pass  the same.

The President decided that  it required  an affirmative vote  of  two thirds  of  the senators  present,  only.

From this decision  Mr. Trumbull appealed;  and  On the question,  Shall the decision of  the Chair  stand  as  the judgment of  the Senate?
It was determined in the affirmative,
Yeas ... 33    Nays ... 1 ”
 Mr. Wade voted in the negative.
So  the decision of the Chair was sustained.”

Pages 383 - 384:  “ Mr. Foot  submitted the following resolution  for consideration:  Resolved,  That  the thanks of  the Senate  are due  and are  hereby tendered  to the honorable  John C. Breckinridge  for  the able,  dignified,  and impartial manner  in which  he has discharged  the laborious duties of  the Chair,  during the term  of  his presiding over  this body.  The Senate  proceeded,  by  unanimous consent,  to consider  the resolution,  and  The resolution  was unanimously  agreed to.
Pages 396 - 397:  “A message  from the House of  Representatives,  by  Mr. Forney,  its Clerk:
Mr. President:  The President of  the United States  approved and signed,  the 2d March,  the following acts  and joint resolutions:  H. R. 80  Joint resolution  to amend the Constitution of  the United States.
 The honorable  Hannibal Hamlin,  Vice-President elect,  entered the Senate chamber, . . .”
Page 398:  Whereupon  The Vice-President  administered to  Mr. Hamlin  the oath of  office  as  Vice-President of  the  United States;  and announced  that  the hour for the termination  of  the present Congress  had arrived,  and declared  the Senate adjourned  without day.”


MONDAY,  March 4, 1861.  Special Session of  the Senate  “convened at  twelve o’clock”  for  “an  extraordinary occasion”.


     The Journal of  the  House  of  Representatives,  has this message from the Senate:
“The Senate  have passed a  joint resolution  of  this House”  (H. Res. 80)  to amend the Constitution  of  the  United States.

Meating of  the Minds?  Morrill Tariff,
      Politics of  Slavery,  TaxJudas.com 
LandGrab.us